Main Article Content

Abstract

The dream of a 'link and match' between schools and industry to become a reality is a big target to be achieved by the government. For that we need the support of superior human resources (HR) so that development can run well. One of the concepts of the learning approach carried out by the Ministry of Education and Culture is for schools to produce superior human resources in accordance with the needs of the industrial world through the teaching factory (TEFA) program. Recent research has demonstrated an urgent need for future engineers. This research is a continuous experimental study for 2 semesters by applying it to all samples, to see if there is a significant effect on TEFA. Research that uses the Ex-Post Facto approach. The population in this study were students of the Heavy Equipment Engineering Department at SMK Negeri 1 Guguak. The sample is class XI students of the Heavy Equipment Engineering Department who have obtained the Teaching Factory Learning Model as many as 32 people who were selected using a non-probability technique, namely Purposive Sampling. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis. The result of t-test is smaller than t-table (-0.381 < 1.697). This shows that the negative effect of the application of (TEFA) on the Learning Outcomes of Class XI Students in Powertrain and Undercarriage subjects is not only insignificant or very small, it can even be said to have no effect.

Keywords

Teaching Factory Learning Outcomes Power Train and Undercarriage Heavy Equipment

Article Details

How to Cite
Wagino, W., Giatman, M., Syah, N., & Nanda, I. (2022). Application of the Teaching Factory Model to the Learning Outcomes of Class XI Students in the Heavy Equipment Engineering Department. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 22(2), 73-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v22i2.1021

References

  1. Yessy Mulyana, “ Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Teaching Factory Pada Program Keahlian Teknik Audio Video Di SMKN 6 Bandung,” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  2. D. Prasetyowati, I. Indiati, and A. Nayla, “Analisis Keterlaksanaan Perencanaan Dan Proses Kegiatan Pembelajaran Praktik Di Smk Selama Pandemi Covid 19,” J. Riptek, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2021.
  3. N. Midayati, “Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2018,” Ber. Resmi Stat., no. 42, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: No. 74/11/35/Th.XVI, 5 November 2018.
  4. Adhistami Putri Pradani, “PRESTASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK DITINJAU DARI IMPLEMENTASI KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU,” vol. Vol. 2, No, no. e-ISSN: 2746-2196, p-ISSN: 2746-7740, 2021.
  5. S. Johari, Teori Pembelajaran, vol. 1. 2018.
  6. J. H. and I. Flood, “Strategi Pengembangan Kompetensi Siswa dengan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah,” J. Anal., vol. 9, no. Kolisch 1996, pp. 49–56, 2012.
  7. T. K. Pelaksanaan, Teaching Factory. .
  8. E. Makhbubah and Rusdarti, “Pembelajaran Teaching Factory Berbasis Unit Produksi Untuk Meningkatkan Semangat Kewirausahaan Siswa,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.
  9. A. Rosyida, “EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEACHING FACTORY DALAM MENINGKATKAN KARAKTER WIRAUSAHA SISWA SMK,” vol. 10, pp. 91–101, 2021.
  10. Instruksi Presiden, “Instruksi Presiden Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Revitalisasi SMK dalam rangka Peningkatan Kualitas dan Daya Saing SDM Indonesia.” pp. 1–10, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://kemdikbud.go.id/main/files/download/e451d9ec3a04121.
  11. Teni Nurrita, “Kata Kunci :Pengembangan media pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa,” J. misykat, vol. 03, no. 01, p. 171, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/271164-pengembangan-media-pembelajaran-untuk-me-b2104bd7.pdf.
  12. J. Manajemen et al., “Analisis Strategi Pengembangan Teaching Farm / Teaching Factory ( TEFA ),” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 295–299, 2021.
  13. M. Syaifuddin and A. Taufiq, “Strategi Mindset System Belajar Kritis Komprehensif,” vol. XII, no. 1, 2020.
  14. A. Dardiri, S. Soekopitojo, J. Perhotelan, P. N. Balikpapan, and U. N. Malang, “Penerapan Teaching Factory Jasa Boga untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Entrepreneur Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2018.
  15. N. Fitrihana, “Design Learning of Teaching Factory in Mechanical Engineering Design Learning of Teaching Factory in Mechanical Engineering,” 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012104.
  16. J. P. Vokasi, “Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri the Implementation of the Production / Service Unit in Public Vocational High Schools of the Business,” Management, vol. 2, no. November, pp. 338–354, 2012.
  17. D. I. Smk and N. Pontianak, “JURKAMI : Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi.”
  18. T. Orres, “Design Learning of Teaching Factory in Mechanical Engineering Design Learning of Teaching Factory in Mechanical Engineering,” p. 111, 2017.
  19. P. Penelitian, K. Pendidikan, and K. Pendidikan, “TEACHING FACTORY SEBAGAI UPAYA TEACHING FACTORY AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE,” pp. 159–181, 2020.
  20. D. M. Putri, Isnandar, and A. N. Handayani, “Pelaksanaan Teaching Factory Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK Memasuki Dunia Industri,” J. Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf., no. September, pp. 238–243, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://seminar.unmer.ac.id/index.php/senasif/2017/paper/view/38.
  21. C. W. Arciniegas Paspuel, O. G., Álvarez Hernández, S. R., Castro Morales, L. G., & Maldonado Gudiño, “WORKSHOP TATA KELOLA TEACHING FACTORY (TEFA) DALAM MENINGKATKAN MUTU LULUSAN PADA SMK JURUSAN AKUNTANSI,” vol. 5, no. 2, p. 6, 2021.
  22. N. Maryanti, “Siswa Smk Siap Hadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 (Kajian Praktis Smk Di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan),” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 0, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.
  23. S. Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan. JAKARTA: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
  24. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
  25. A. Mahmud Rayyan, Rusli Ismail, “PENERAPAN TEACHING FACTORY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI PADA MATA PELAJARAN LAS BUSUR MANUAL (SMAW) JURUSAN TEKNIK LAS SMK NEGERI 3 GOWA,” 2546.