Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 73 Download : 90

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The application of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model in CAD courses has so far not been satisfactory. the results of the design drawings produced by students could not be implemented because the size, component layout, beauty did not meet the criteria. As a result, the students failure rate in CAD courses from 2019 to 2022 is quite high. PjBL with the STEAM approach is a solution because with STEAM the design of the images produced by students is based on criteria Science, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics. This type of research uses Classroom Action Research, which is an examination of activities that are deliberately raised and occur in a class, and have 3 Cycle. The process of implementing the research consists of four components, namely planning, action, observation, and reflection. The population is Diploma 3 Automotive Engineering Students in Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang (FT UNP) who are enrolled in the CAD course for the Semester January - June 2022 and totaling 46 students. The data collection techniques through observation sheets and students performance in designing drawings using CAD software. The results of the study show that the implementation of PjBL with the STEAM approach can improve the quality of learning. The quality of learning observed is the activity of lecturers and students and learning outcomes. The percentage of lecturer activity in the learning process is 77% and increases in cycles 2 and 3 with percentages of 85.90% and 89.6%. While students activity in the learning process cycle 1 obtained a percentage of 62.4%, increased in cycles 2 and 3 of 73.20% and 87.70%.  courses computer aided design using a project-based learning approach STEAM can increase the average value of students. This is based on the average grade of students drawing projects in cycle 1 of 33.04, Whereas in cycle 2 it was 69.80 and the average students score in cycle 3 was 76.42.

Keywords

Learning Model Project Based Learning (PjBL) STEAM CAD

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Irma Yulia Basri, M. Giatman, Mukhlidi Muskhir, Hansi Effendi, Ambiyar Ambiyar, Eni Elfina, Tri Putra Yuliardi (2023)
How to Cite
Basri, I., Giatman, M., Muskhir, M., Effendi, H., Ambiyar, A., Elfina, E., & Yuliardi, T. (2023). Improving the Quality of Learning Through Project Based Learning (PjBL) With the STEAM Approach in CAD Courses in the Department of Automotive Engineering Universitas Negeri Padang. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 23(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v23i1.1068

References

  1. Perpres RI, “Peraturan Presiden RI No. 68 Tahun 2022 tentang Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi dan Pelatihan Vokasi,” no. 132424, 2022.
  2. C. Midler and R. Beaume, “Project-based learning patterns for dominant design renewal: The case of Electric Vehicle,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 142–150, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.10.006.
  3. UNP, “Buku Pedoman Akademik Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang 2018/2019,” 2018.
  4. R. Mukhaiyar, Mukhaiyar, D. E. Myori, Hambali, and N. Utari, “Reorganizing the Curriculum of the Study Programs of the Electrical Engineering Fields in Universitas Negeri Padang as Its Eminent Policy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1387, no. 1, pp. 0–4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012043.
  5. Z. F. Zulaikha, H. Hariri, R. Rini, and S. Sowiyah, “Analysis of vocational education curriculum in ASEAN Economic Community: a literature review,” J. Soc. Humanit. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 157–170, 2021, doi: 10.35912/jshe.v1i3.357.
  6. R. Lapisa, I. Y. Basri, A. Arif, and H. D. Saputra, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Siswa Melalui Pelatihan Auto Cad,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 119–126, 2017, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v17i2.82.
  7. H. Nordahl-Pedersen and K. Heggholmen, “What promotes motivation and learning in project management students?,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 196, no. 2021, pp. 791–799, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.077.
  8. E. C. Kartika Putra and S. Suyitno, “Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Pada Pembelajaran Praktik Teknik Pembentukan Dasar dengan Menggunakan Metode Project Based Learning,” Auto Tech J. Pendidik. Tek. Otomotif Univ. Muhammadiyah Purworejo, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 150–158, 2021, doi: 10.37729/autotech.v16i2.1216.
  9. S. D. Ardianti and S. A. Raida, “The Effect of Project Based Learning with Ethnoscience Approach on Science Conceptual Understanding,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.89.
  10. M. Nasir, R. Fakhrunnisa, and L. R. Nastiti, “The Implementation of Project-based Learning and Guided Inquiry to Improve Science Process Skills and Students Cognitive Learning Outcomes,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 229–238, 2019.
  11. A. D. M. Hawari and A. I. M. Noor, “Project Based Learning Pedagogical Design in STEAM Art Education,” Asian J. Univ. Educ., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 102–111, 2020, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11072.
  12. S. Suryaningsih and F. A. Nisa, “Kontribusi STEAM Project Based Leaarning dalam Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa,” J. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1097–1111, 2021.
  13. M. Imaduddin, S. Sholikhati, and M. In’ami, “STEM Education Research in Indonesian Elementary Schools: A Systematic Review of Project-Based Learning,” Elem. Islam. Teach. J., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 201, 2021, doi: 10.21043/elementary.v9i2.11552.
  14. Sustiningsih, S. Utaminingsih, and Santoso, “Development of Science Teaching Materials Based on STEM: A Needs Analysis,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1823, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012081.
  15. T. L. Bui et al., “Dataset of Vietnamese preschool teachers’ readiness towards implementing STEAM activities and projects,” Data Br., vol. 46, p. 108821, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108821.
  16. H. M. Thuneberg, H. S. Salmi, and F. X. Bogner, “How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 29, no. July, pp. 153–160, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003.
  17. O. Di, S. M. A. Negeri, P. Studi, P. Fisika, F. Teknik, and U. Malikussaleh, “Universitas Abulyatama Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan PENGARUH MODEL PROJECT BASED LEARNING BERBASIS STEAM TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA PADA MATERI ALAT- ALAT,” vol. 8848, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2022.
  18. I. H. Mu’minah, “Pembelajaran Abad-21 Melalui Pendekatan Steam (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) Dalam Menyongsong Era Society 5.0,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 584–594, 2021.
  19. B. Iaskyana, C. Triatna, and N. Nurdin, “Kajian Pedagogik dalam Implementasi STEAM pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Era Pandemi,” SAP (Susunan Artik. Pendidikan), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2022, doi: 10.30998/sap.v7i1.12972.
  20. V. Hlukhaniuk, V. Solovei, S. Tsvilyk, and I. Shymkova, “Steam Education As a Benchmark for Innovative Training of Future Teachers of Labour Training and Technology,” Soc. Integr. Educ. Proc. Int. Sci. Conf., vol. 1, p. 211, 2020, doi: 10.17770/sie2020vol1.5000.
  21. C. C. Chung, S. L. Huang, Y. M. Cheng, and S. J. Lou, “Using an iSTEAM project-based learning model for technology senior high school students: Design, development, and evaluation,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 905–941, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09643-5.
  22. S. Han, R. Rosli, M. M. Capraro, and R. M. Capraro, “The effect of Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on students’ Achievement in four mathematics topics,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. Specialissue, pp. 3–30, 2016, doi: 10.12973/tused.10168a.
  23. Nuraini and W. Muliawan, “Development of Science Learning with Project Based Learning on Science Process Skill : A Needs Analysis Study,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1539, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012055.
  24. E. Commission - JRC - IPTS, Authors: Romina Cachia, Anusca Ferrari, Kirsti Ala-Mutka and Yves Punie Creative Learning and Innovative Teaching Final Report on the Study on Creativity and Innovation in Education in the EU Member States. 2010. doi: 10.2791/52913.
  25. T. A. Jacub, H. Marto, and A. Darwis, “Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPS (Studi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas di SMP Negeri 2 Tolitoli),” Tolis Ilm. J. Penelit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 2020.
  26. Syaidah, “Penerapan Observasi Tutor Sebaya Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Afektif Siswa Kelas XI MIPA1 SMAN 2 Tanjung Jabung Barat Tahun 2019,” Https://Medium.Com/, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.51878/strategi.v1i2.580.
  27. H. Ibda, “Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Resensi Buku Ilmiah pada Mahasiswa Melalui Program Satu Semester Satu Resensi (Tuter Tensi),” Disastra J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.29300/disastra.v2i1.1998.
  28. A. Parnawi, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (Classroom Action Research), Pertama. Yogyakarta: Deepublish (Grup Penerbit CV Budi Utama), 2020.
  29. I. Fiteriani, R. Diani, A. Hamidah, and C. Anwar, “Project-based learning through STEM approach: Is it effective to improve students’ creative problem-solving ability and metacognitive skills in physics learning?,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1796, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012058.
  30. N. Jalinus, R. A. Nabawi, and A. Mardin, “The Seven Steps of Project Based Learning Model to Enhance Productive Competences of Vocational Students,” vol. 102, no. Ictvt, pp. 251–256, 2017, doi: 10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.43.
  31. W. Sumarni, S. Wardani, S. Sudarmin, and D. N. Gupitasari, “Project based learning (PBL) to improve psychomotoric skills: A classroom action research,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–163, 2016, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v5i2.4402.