Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 57 Download : 52

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Implementation of the developed Learning Implementation Plan (LIP) will result in the risk of learning not being in line with expectations if the validity of the product is not guaranteed. Thus, this research aims to investigate the validity of developing project-based lesson plans to improve effective learning outcomes. This research is research and development with a quantitative approach using the ADDIE model procedure. To obtain product validity results, the stages used are only in the development phase. The subjects in this research were 2 expert lecturers and 3 productive teachers with expertise in light vehicle engineering, and the instrument used was a feasibility questionnaire. The findings were that the project-based LIP that was developed had an average score of 88.7% in the valid category. This study concludes that it has succeeded in developing a product in the form of a valid and usable project-based lesson plan. Carrying out learning using lesson plans that are integrated with project-based learning can be an alternative to providing more meaningful learning and have a positive impact on student development.

Keywords

Learning Implementation Plan Problem-Based Learning ADDIE Model Validity Test

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Muslim Muslim, Ambiyar Ambiyar, Arwizet Karudin, Doni Tri Putra Yanto, Nuzul Hidayat, Ahmad Arif, Toto Sugiarto (2023)
How to Cite
Muslim, M., Ambiyar, A., Karudin, A., Putra Yanto, D., Hidayat, N., Arif, A., & Sugiarto, T. (2023). Analyzing the Validity of Project-Based Learning Implementation Plans in Light Vehicle maintenance: A Comprehensive Study. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 23(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v23i1.1112

References

  1. N. Karuna, “Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dalam Menyusun RPP Melalui Penerapan Supervisi Akademik,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, May 2023, doi: 10.23887/jear.v7i2.59482.
  2. I. N. Wandri, “Peningkatan Kompotensi Guru Melalui Pelatihan Membuat RPP Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi dengan Mengaktifkan MGMP Tingkat SMA/K di Kabupaten Bangli,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.23887/jear.v3i2.17276.
  3. D. A. P. Widiasih, “Efektivias Pendekatan Kerja Praktek dengan Teknik Umpan Balik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dakam Menyusun RPP,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.23887/jear.v5i1.32499.
  4. M. K. Abadi, H. Pujiastuti, and L. D. Assaat, “Development of Teaching Materials Based Interactive Scientific Approach towards the Concept of Social Arithmetic For Junior High School Student,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 812, no. 1, p. 012015, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012015.
  5. N. Amini, Y. Sefri, and M. Radid, “Factors affecting students’ career choices in Morocco,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. IJERE, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23795.
  6. I. M. D. Wibawa, “Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru dalam Menyusun Silabus dan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) melalui Supervisi Kolegial,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 3, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.23887/jear.v3i1.17092.
  7. W. R. Penuel, B. J. Fishman, B. Haugan Cheng, and N. Sabelli, “Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design,” Educ. Res., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 331–337, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.3102/0013189X11421826.
  8. D. N. Masmin, “Implementasi Supervisi Klinis untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru dalam Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 4, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.23887/jear.v4i3.27186.
  9. K. Widawati, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dalam Menyusun RPP Melalui Workshop Dimasa Pandemi Covid 19 Pada SMA,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 5, no. 3, Art. no. 3, May 2021, doi: 10.23887/jear.v5i3.34578.
  10. X. Jiang, “Construction of Project-Based and School-Based Teaching Material of Visual Identity in Higher Vocational College Under the Background of Computer,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1992, no. 4, p. 042015, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1992/4/042015.
  11. M. A. Almulla, “The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (pbl) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 215824402093870, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244020938702.
  12. M. Muslim, H. D. Saputra, M. Y. Setiawan, M. Martias, and M. Nasir, “The Influence of Project-Based Learning on Student’s Intrinsic Learning Motivation,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 105–118, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v21i2.915.
  13. M. Muslim, A. Ambiyar, D. Setiawan, and R. Putra, “Developing Project-based Learning Tools for Light Vehicle Engine Maintenance Subjects at Vocational High School,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v10i1.29564.
  14. O. A. Saputro and T. S. Rahayu, “Perbedaan Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PJBL) dan Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berbantuan Media Monopoli terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2020, doi: 10.23887/jipp.v4i1.24719.
  15. F. Eliza, S. Syamsuarnis, D. E. Myori, and H. Hamdani, “Project based Learning in Lighting Instalations for Simple Buildings Course,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v17i1.13.
  16. M. S. Marheni, “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Menyusun RPP melalui Supervisi Akademik Berkelanjutan,” J. Educ. Action Res., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.23887/jear.v6i1.44468.
  17. M. Baghoussi and I. Z. El Ouchdi, “The Implementation of the Project-Based Learning Approach in the Algerian EFL Context: Curriculum Designers’ Expectations and Teachers’ Obstacles,” Arab World Engl. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol10no1.23.
  18. P. L. Ariyanti, “Pengembangan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran ( RPP) Tema Keluargaku pada Siswa Kelas I Berbasis Kecakapan Belajar dan Berinovasi Abad 21,” PENDASI J. Pendidik. Dasar Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpdi.v4i1.3097.
  19. S. Chen and B. Wei, “Development and validation of an instrument to measure high school students’ science identity in science learning,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 111–126, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09932-y.
  20. X. Zhai, J. Krajcik, and J. W. Pellegrino, “On the validity of machine learning-based next generation science assessments: a validity inferential network,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 298–312, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10956-020-09879-9.
  21. M. Juniantari, G. A. Mahayukti, I. N. Gita, and I. P. P. Suryawan, “Validity of Introduction to Basic Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on Conceptual Understanding Procedures Models and Character Education,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1503, no. 1, p. 012018, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012018.
  22. O. Candra, U. Usmeldi, D. T. P. Yanto, and F. Ismanto, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum Inkuiri untuk Mata Pelajaran Menganalisis Rangkaian Listrik,” JINoP J. Inov. Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2020, doi: 10.22219/jinop.v6i1.11756.
  23. D. D. E. Wati, “Validitas buku panduan penyusunan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP) yang terintegrasi kecakapan abad 21,” Phys. Sci. Educ. J. PSEJ, pp. 108–115, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.30631/psej.v1i3.813.
  24. E. Y. Siregar, A. Holila, and M. Ahmad, “The Validity of Learning Devices with a Contextual Approach to Improve Concept Understanding Abilities,” Akad. J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 02, Art. no. 02, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.34005/akademika.v9i02.929.
  25. M. Latjompoh, “Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Berorientasi Keterampilan Proses Sains untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir dan Menanamkan Karakter bagi Siswa SMA Kota Gorontalo,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Hayati, vol. 6, pp. 470–477, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.29407/hayati.v6i1.607.
  26. K. Ulfa, “Validitas Pengembangan Strategi Pembelajaran PPDP pada Materi Fotosintesis untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kelas XII SMA Di Kota Palembang,” Bioilmi J. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.19109/bioilmi.v6i1.5720.
  27. Y. Yondriadi, N. Jalinus, and N. Syah, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model PjBL Pada Mata Diklat Teknik Digital,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. Kejuru., vol. 1, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.24036/jptk.v1i3.2323.
  28. B. Qur’ani, “Development of Learning Tools Project Based Learning to Increasing the Basic Skills of Catering Students at Smk 6 Makassar,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. Kejuru., vol. 3, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.24036/jptk.v3i2.6723.
  29. S. J. McGriff, “Instructional System Design (ISD): Using the ADDIE Model,” Retrieved June, vol. 10, no. 2003, pp. 513–553, 2000.
  30. T. Trianto, Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2014.
  31. N. Purwanto, Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, 20th ed. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2020. Accessed: May 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=647732
  32. N. Hidayah, “Pengembangan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Tema Hidup Bersih dan Sehat Kelas Ii Berbasis Kecakapan Belajar dan Berinovasi Abad 21,” PENDASI J. Pendidik. Dasar Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpdi.v4i1.3102.
  33. R. Kaliisa, I. Jivet, and P. Prinsloo, “A Checklist to Guide the Planning, Designing, Implementation, and Evaluation of Learning Analytics Dashboards,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 28, May 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00394-6.
  34. P. A. E. Arseni, “Pengembangan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Tema Tugasku Sehari-Hari Kelas Ii Sd Berbasis Kecakapan Belajar dan Berinovasi Abad 21,” PENDASI J. Pendidik. Dasar Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpdi.v4i1.3079.
  35. R. Rusmanto and K. Rukun, “The Development of E-Learning Module Based on Project-Based Learning (PjBL) for Electric Motor Installation Course,” J. Educ. Res. Eval., vol. 4, no. 2, Art. no. 2, May 2020, doi: 10.23887/jere.v4i2.24608.
  36. K. W. Johnson, “An Exploration of Employer Participation in Internships and Other Work-Based Learning Experiences,” vol. 37, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2022, doi: 10.21061/jtce.v37i1.a1.
  37. T. Anjarini and Suyoto, “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terintegrasi HOTS di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Ris. Sos. Hum. Dan Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.56444/soshumdik.v1i4.221.