Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 74 Download : 50

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The era of Society 5.0 demands that human resources possess critical thinking skills in response to rapid changes in the field of education, with Vocational High Schools (VHS) playing a central role in shaping students to be critical and creative. To achieve optimal results, further breakthroughs in the use of educational technology are needed, such as the implementation of Augmented Reality (AR)-based flipbooks in the vocational school environment. This study aims to evaluate the level of critical thinking skills among vocational school students. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental design with descriptive quantitative data analysis. This research was conducted with 64 tenth-grade students at a vocational school in Bandung. The instruments used to obtain data included critical thinking skills tests. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative analysis to evaluate the improvement of students' understanding and critical thinking skills. The research data was tested using normality test, homogeneity test, independent test, and N-Gain. Research data indicates that the use of AR-based flipbooks significantly enhances student comprehension, with an N-gain value of 0.6 observed in the experimental class. Consequently, it can be concluded that the implementation of AR-based flipbooks effectively improves students' critical thinking abilities in VHS, offering substantial promise for developing more interactive and efficient learning technologies for future education.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Critical Thinking Flipbook Media Vocational School

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Zenita Sabitri, Danny Meirawan, Sri Rahayu (2024)
How to Cite
Sabitri, Z., Meirawan, D., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Enhancing Vocational Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Society 5.0 with Flipbook and Augmented Reality Learning Media. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 24(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v24i1.1166

References

  1. H. Legi, D. Damanik, and Y. Giban, “Transforming Education Through Technological Innovation In The Face Of The Era Of Society 5.0,” J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, 2023, [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.55904/educenter.v2i2.822
  2. S. Supa’at and I. Ihsan, “The Challenges of Elementary Education in Society 5.0 Era,” Int. J. Soc. Learn., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 341–360, 2023, doi: 10.47134/ijsl.v3i3.214.
  3. M. Keshav, L. Julien, and J. Miezel, “The Role Of Technology In Era 5.0 In The Development Of Arabic Language In The World Of Education,” J. Int. Ling. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–98, 2022, doi: 10.55849/jiltech.v1i2.85.
  4. A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, no. February, pp. 275–285, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
  5. M. Diao and J. G. Hedberg, “Mobile and emerging learning technologies: are we ready?,” EMI. Educ. Media Int., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 233–252, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09523987.2020.1824422.
  6. E. Arthur-Nyarko, D. D. Agyei, and J. K. Armah, “Digitizing distance learning materials: Measuring students’ readiness and intended challenges,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2987–3002, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10060-y.
  7. H. Tkacová, R. Králik, M. Tvrdoň, Z. Jenisová, and J. G. Martin, “Credibility and Involvement of Social Media in Education—Recommendations for Mitigating the Negative Effects of the Pandemic among High School Students,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052767.
  8. D. I. Ruzieva, N. R. Rustamova, D. S. Tursunov, and A. J. Khurramov, “The technology of developing media culture in higher educational students,” Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil., vol. 24, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I9/PR290060.
  9. Y. D. Puspitarini and M. Hanif, “Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School,” Anatol. J. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2019, doi: 10.29333/aje.2019.426a.
  10. M. I. Qureshi, N. Khan, H. Raza, A. Imran, and F. Ismail, “Digital Technologies in Education 4.0. Does it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning?,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 31–47, 2021, doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V15I04.20291.
  11. T. Anderson and P. Rivera-Vargas, “A critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective,” Digit. Educ. Rev., no. 37, pp. 208–229, 2020, doi: 10.1344/DER.2020.37.208-229.
  12. D. Hillmayr, L. Ziernwald, F. Reinhold, S. I. Hofer, and K. M. Reiss, “The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 153, no. September 2018, p. 103897, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897.
  13. Y. Supriani, F. Meliani, A. Supriyadi, S. Supiana, and Q. Y. Zaqiah, “The Process of Curriculum Innovation: Dimensions, Models, Stages, and Affecting Factors,” Nazhruna J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 485–500, 2022, doi: 10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2235.
  14. F. T. Ingtias, D. Ampera, F. Farihah, B. K. Amal, and A. S. Purba, “Implementation of Teaching Practitioners In Improving The Quality of Learning and Implementing The Curriculum Merdeka Belajar,” J. Stud. Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–169, 2022, doi: 10.30605/jsgp.5.2.2022.1927.
  15. M. D. Abdulrahaman et al., “Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05312, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312.
  16. L. Li, G. Xiong, X. Yuan, J. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Parameter Extraction of Photovoltaic Models Using a Dynamic Self-Adaptive and Mutual- Comparison Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 52425–52441, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069748.
  17. R. E. Wijaya, M. Mustaji, and H. Sugiharto, “Development of Mobile Learning in Learning Media to Improve Digital Literacy and Student Learning Outcomes in Physics Subjects: Systematic Literature Review,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3087–3098, 2021, doi: 10.33258/birci.v4i2.2027.
  18. S. Sumarwati, H. Fitriyani, F. M. A. Setiaji, M. H. Amiruddin, and S. A. Jalil, “Developing mathematics learning media based on elearning using moodle on geometry subject to improve students’ higher order thinking skills,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 182–191, 2020, doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V14I04.12731.
  19. V. Hassija, V. Chamola, V. Saxena, D. Jain, P. Goyal, and B. Sikdar, “A Survey on IoT Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 82721–82743, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924045.
  20. D. Irawati, H. Najili, S. Supiana, and Q. Y. Zaqiah, “Merdeka Belajar Curriculum Innovation and Its Application in Education Units,” Edumaspul J. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2506–2514, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/maspuljr/article/view/4603
  21. Y. Pratikno, E. Hermawan, and A. L. Arifin, “Human Resource ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’ from Design to Implementation in the School: What Worked and What not in Indonesian Education,” J. Iqra’ Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 326–343, 2022, doi: 10.25217/ji.v7i1.1708.
  22. I. M. A. Putra, I. M. R. J. Widanta, I. W. D. Ardika, P. D. Hudiananingsih, N. N. Yuliantini, and A. A. R. Sitawati, “Designing English for Vocational Purposes (EVP) in the Context of Merdeka Belajar of Kampus Merdeka,” Proc. Int. Conf. Appl. Sci. Technol. Soc. Sci. (ICAST-SS 2020), vol. 544, pp. 266–272, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210424.051.
  23. V. Ratten and P. Usmanij, “Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction?,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 100367, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367.
  24. N. Shamsuddin and J. Kaur, “Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter?,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 195–202, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422.
  25. R. Shwartz-Ziv and A. Armon, “Tabular data: Deep learning is not all you need,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 81, pp. 84–90, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011.
  26. B. Bruggeman, J. Tondeur, K. Struyven, B. Pynoo, A. Garone, and S. Vanslambrouck, “Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 48, no. September 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772.
  27. A. Kumar et al., “Blended Learning Tools and Practices: A Comprehensive Analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 85151–85197, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085844.
  28. Y. HACIOĞLU and F. GÜLHAN, “The Effects of STEM Education on the 7th Grade Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and STEM Perceptions,” J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Heal., 2021, doi: 10.21891/jeseh.771331.
  29. T. Zhang, Z. A. Shaikh, A. V. Yumashev, and M. Chład, “Applied model of E-learning in the framework of education for sustainable development,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12166420.
  30. S. Taimur and H. Sattar, “Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency,” pp. 238–248, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_64.
  31. N. J. Alsaleh, “Teaching critical thinking skills.,” TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 433–434, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780429342042.
  32. S. Kaeophanuek and N. Chookerd, “A Development of the Flipped Learning Model Using the Critical Inquiry Process to Enhance Research Skills,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 70–83, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i03.17905.
  33. R. Febrianti, Y. A, R. P. Putra, and P. Phongdala, “Implementation of project-based learning for improve students’ critical thinking skills in creative product and entrepreneurship subjects,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. Kejuru., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 240–247, 2023, doi: 10.24036/jptk.v6i4.34523.
  34. S. Suhirman, S. Prayogi, and M. Asy’ari, “Problem-Based Learning with Character-Emphasis and Naturalist Intelligence: Examining Students Critical Thinking and Curiosity,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–232, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14213a.
  35. I. Prasetyo, Y. Suryono, and S. Gupta, “The 21st Century Life Skills-Based Education Implementation at the Non-Formal Education Institution,” J. Nonform. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jne.v7i1.26385.
  36. J. Maknun, “Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Understanding Physics Concepts and Critical Thinking Skill of Vocational High School Students,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 117, 2020, doi: 10.5539/ies.v13n6p117.
  37. S. Rahayu et al., The Level Analysis of Student Employability Skill for the Needs of the Work Industry in Vocational Education in the VUCA World, no. Veic 2023. Atlantis Press SARL, 2024. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-198-2_35.
  38. L. Bellaera, Y. Weinstein-Jones, S. Ilie, and S. T. Baker, “Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 41, no. January, p. 100856, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856.
  39. G. Reynders, J. Lantz, S. M. Ruder, C. L. Stanford, and R. S. Cole, “Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5.
  40. N. A. Al-Husban, “Critical Thinking Skills in Asynchronous Discussion Forums: A Case Study,” Int. J. Technol. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 82, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijte.v3i2.22.
  41. T. Mogea, “Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability in English,” J. Pendidik. dan Sastra Ingg., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 157–171, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v2i3.977
  42. H. Pettersson, “De-idealising the educational ideal of critical thinking,” Theory Res. Educ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 322–338, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1477878520981303.
  43. A. D. Marthaliakirana, H. Suwono, M. Saefi, and A. Gofur, “Problem-based learning with metacognitive prompts for enhancing argumentation and critical thinking of secondary school students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 18, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12304.
  44. A. Marini et al., “Model of character building applied in physical education and sport class: Case in Indonesia,” J. Phys. Educ. Sport, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 2389–2394, 2021, doi: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s4320.
  45. A. H. Abdullah et al., “Does the Use of Smart Board Increase Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)?,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 1833–1854, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042832.
  46. D. Saepuloh, A. Sabur, S. Lestari, and S. U. Mukhlishoh, “Improving Students’ Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy by Learning Higher Order Thinking Skills Through Problem Based Learning Models,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 495, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.31029.
  47. N. S. Misrom, M. S. Abdurrahman, A. H. Abdullah, S. Osman, M. H. Hamzah, and A. Fauzan, “Enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) through an inductive reasoning strategy using geogebra,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 156–179, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i03.9839.
  48. R. Darmayanti, R. Sugianto, B. Baiduri, C. Choirudin, and W. Wawan, “Digital comic learning media based on character values on students’ critical thinking in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles,” Al-Jabar J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2022, doi: 10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11680.
  49. P. Ninghardjanti and C. H. A. Dirgatama, “Building Critical Thinking Skills Through a New Design Mobile-Based Interactive Learning Media Knowledge Framework,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 49–68, 2021, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23801.
  50. A. Supriyatno, Triyo; Susilawati, Samsul; Hassan, “The implementation of virtual choir recordings during distance learning,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1117–1127, 2020, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5159.
  51. S. Chaivisit, Y. Kim, T. Do, and A. Ibukun, “Creating Interactive Books with Augmented Reality,” J. Technol. Lessons Teach., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3–12, 2024, doi: 10.13001/jtilt.v2i2.7369.
  52. N. L. Badriyah, M. Yusuf, and A. Efendi, “Augmented Reality as a Media for Distance Learning in the Digital Era: Contribution in Improving Critical Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1769–1775, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1988.
  53. H. Urban, G. Pelikan, and C. Schranz, “Augmented Reality in AEC Education: A Case Study,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12040391.
  54. T. Seyman Guray and B. Kismet, “Applicability of a digitalization model based on augmented reality for building construction education in architecture,” Constr. Innov., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 193–212, 2023, doi: 10.1108/CI-07-2021-0136.
  55. E. İbili, M. Çat, D. Resnyansky, S. Şahin, and M. Billinghurst, “An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 224–246, 2020, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382.
  56. A. E. Putri and H. Education, “Utilization of Digital Literacy in History Learning As a Teacher ’ S Effort To Improve Students ’,” J. Sci., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1963–1968, 2023, doi: ttps://doi.org/10.58471/scientia.v12i04.2082
  57. M. Miratunnisah, “Study of Literature: The Role of Traditional Games as a Learning Media to Instill Character Education in Elementary School Students,” MANDALIKA J. Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2024, doi: 10.56566/mandalika.v2i1.174.
  58. F. R. Rahim, “Interactive Learning Media for Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Development,” Pillar Phys. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, p. 235, 2022, doi: 10.24036/14085171074.
  59. Kardoyo, A. Nurkhin, Muhsin, and H. Pramusinto, “Problem-based learning strategy: Its impact on students’ critical and creative thinking skills,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1141–1150, 2020, doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1141.
  60. A. Maryam, D. Mohammadreza, S. Abdolhussein, R. Ghobad, and K. Javad, “Effect of Concept Mapping Education on Critical Thinking Skills of Medical Students: A Quasi-experimental Study,” Ethiop. J. Health Sci., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 409–418, 2021, doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i2.24.
  61. V. Serevina, D. A. Nugroho, and H. F. Lipikuni, “Improving the Quality of Education Through Effectiveness of E-Module Based on Android for Improving the Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Pandemic Era,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2022, Avaiable: https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJEM/article/view/34509
  62. M. Noetel et al., Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review, vol. 91, no. 2. 2021. doi: 10.3102/0034654321990713.
  63. T. T. Wijaya, Y. Cao, R. Weinhandl, and M. Tamur, “A meta-analysis of the effects of E-books on students’ mathematics achievement,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e09432, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09432.
  64. W. Mao, Y. Cui, M. M. Chiu, and H. Lei, “Effects of Game-Based Learning on Students’ Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1682–1708, 2022, doi: 10.1177/07356331211007098.
  65. R. Oktarina, A. -, M. G. -, F. -, M. Muskhir, and H. Effendi, “The Effect of The Use of Multimedia Flip Book With the Flipped Classroom Approach in Vocational School,” J. Educ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 159, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i1.31435.
  66. F. Arena, M. Collotta, G. Pau, and F. Termine, “An Overview of Augmented Reality,” Computers, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/computers11020028.
  67. T. A. Syed et al., “In-Depth Review of Augmented Reality: Tracking Technologies, Development Tools, AR Displays, Collaborative AR, and Security Concerns,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23010146.
  68. M. C. Lasi, K. R. Putra, and D. D. S. L. Ismail, “IDEAL Model Education to Increase Knowledge and Self-Care Practices for People with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA): Quasi-Experimental Study,” J. Aisyah J. Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 353–358, 2023, doi: 10.30604/jika.v8i2.1670.
  69. R. Ariawan and A. Wahyuni, “The effect of applying TPS type cooperative learning model assisted by SPSS software on students’ skills in IT-based statistical data analysis course,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1581, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012027.
  70. M. G. Isnawan, U. Nahdlatul, and W. Mataram, Quasi-Experimental Design, no. April. 2023.
  71. R. R. Hake and J. Reece, “ANALYZING CHANGE/GAIN SCORES” 1999. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:141123847
  72. A. Hidayati, Richma; Kusmanto, Agung Slamet; Kiswantoro, “Development and Construct Validation of Indonesian Students Self-Confidance Scale Using Pearson Product Moment,” Pegem J. Educ. Instr., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 94–103, 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.03.11.
  73. M. A. Firdaus, “Development of Assessment Instruments for Fiqh Learning Based on Religious Moderation at Madrasah Tsanawiyah in West Java,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 515–524, 2024.
  74. S. Bozzi, G. Besio, and G. Passoni, “Wave power technologies for the Mediterranean offshore: Scaling and performance analysis,” Coast. Eng., vol. 136, no. March, pp. 130–146, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.03.001.