Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 325 Download : 455

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan  untuk: (1) mengidentifikasi  validitas dan reliabilitas  indikator dari faktor-faktor yang berperan pada produktivitas pendidikan vokasi; (2) membuat model pengukuran faktor dan indikator yang berperan terhadap produktivitas pendidikan vokasi. Populasi penelitian adalah  lulusan D3 pendidikan vokasi dari Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang dan Politeknik Negeri Padang.  Teknik sampling menggunakan simple random sampling, dengan sumber data penelitian meliputi 398 responden lulusan lulusan D3 pendidikan vokasi dari Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang dan Politeknik Negeri Padang. Analisis data dengan Lisrel 8.80 berupa  uji normalitas dan uji multikolonieritas dilanjutkan estimasi asymptotic covariance matrix dengan analisis confirmatory factor analysis. Hasil penelitian mengungkap sebagai berikut: (1) terdapat 23 indikator yang valid dan reliabel dalam merefleksikan  enam variabel yaitu kepemimpinan pengelola, dengan indikator  idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intelectual stimulation, individualized consideration;  suasana akademik dengan indikator lingkungan fisik, lingkungan belajar dan lingkungan akademik; kompetensi dosen dengan indikator kompetensi pedagogik, kompetensi profesional kompetensi kepribadian dan kompetensi sosial; sistem  pembelajaran, dengan indikator learner-focused, worker-focused, attribut-oriented; proses pembelajaan dengan indikator mutu data informasi, mutu pembelajaran, mutu kurikulum, mutu sumber daya; dan produktivitas pendidikan vokasi, dengan indikator mutu lulusan, mutu manajemen, efisiensi internal, efisiensi eksternal, dan penghasilan.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mulianti, M. (2018). Model Pengukuran Faktor dan Indikator yang Berperan Terhadap Produktivitas Pendidikan Vokasi. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 18(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v18i1.217

References

  1. [1] Alan, Thomas, J.,1995, The Productin School: A System Analysis Approach to Education administration, Chichago University
  2. [2] Bagozzi R.P.H. Baumgartener and Yi (1992). State versus action orientation and the Teory of reasoned action. Journal of consumer research.18.505-518.
  3. [3] Boateng, C. (2012). Leadership and effectiveness of principals of vocational technical institution in Ghana. American International Journal of Contemporary, 2 (3), 128-134.
  4. [4] Bentler,P.M. and D.G. Week (199) Signiicant Test and Goodness o Fit in analysis of covariance structures psylogical buletin. 88. 588-606.
  5. [5] Cai, Li & Wang (2009). A discussion on integration of higher vocational collages’culture and enterprise culture. Journal of Jincheng Institute of Technology, 2 (1) 23-30.
  6. [6] Chappell, C. (2013). Changing Pedagogy: Contemporary vocational learning. Research Working Paper 03-12. The Australian Centre for Organizational, Vocational and Adult Learning (OVAL). Sydney: University of Technology.
  7. [7] Doll, W.,J.,Xia, W. &Torkzadeh. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end usercomputing satisfaction instrument. MISQuarterly. December, 453-461. Bandung, Yayasan Amal Keluarga.
  8. [8] Fornel, C.&Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measuring errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18,39-50.London: Prentice-Hall International.
  9. [9] Hashim, J., Mohamad, B., Abidin, B. et.al. (2013). Leadership in technical and vocational education. Journal of Technical EducatiTraining, 2 (1), 49- 66.
  10. [10] Hair, J.F.,Anderson,R.E., Tatham, R.,et. al. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th edition. London: Prentice-Hall International.
  11. [11] Hazliza, N. Azlin, N., Azzarina, N. et. al. (2015). Leadership style head of Politechnic department and regard with to work culture. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (15), 23-30.
  12. [12] Igbaria, M.,N., Zinatelli, P., Cragg et.al. (1997). Personal computing acceptable factors in small firms: A Structural equation model. MIS Quarterly. September, 279-299.
  13. [13] Indrajid R.E. dan Djokopranoto, R., 2006, Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Modern, Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.
  14. [14] Indrasari, M.,Newcombe, P. Eliyana, A. et.al. (2015). The influence of academic climate and individual creativity on lecturer competence in private university at Surabaya Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Management, 10 (8), 127-133.
  15. [15] Jöreskog, K. G. &Sörbom, D. (1996). Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago.
  16. [16] Krisnaveni, R., & Anita, J. (2007). Educator’s professional characteristics. Quality Assurance in Education, 15 (2), 149-161.
  17. [17] Martono, T, Kepemimpinan kepala sekolah,kinerja guru, budaya akademik sekolah pengaruhnya terhadap produktivitas, http://pustaka.uns.ac.id/?menu=news&0ption
  18. [18] Rigdon,E.E. & Fergusson C.E. (1991). The performance of the polychoric correlation coefficient and selected fitting function in factor analysis with ordinal Data. Journal of Marketing Research. 8 November, 491-497.
  19. [19] Robbins, S.P., 2016, Prilaku Organisasi: Konsep Kontroversi, Aplikasi, Ed. Indonesia, Jakarta, PT. Prenhallino.
  20. [20] Tableman, 2014, School Climate and Learning http://outreach.msu.edu/bpbriefs/issues/brief
  21. [21] Walter, R.A., & Grey, K. C. (2002). Preparing, licencing and certifying Post secondary career and technical educators Journal of Vocational Education Research, 2, 27-35.
  22. [22] Twomey, S. M.(2002). The virtual teacher training centre a one year program to transform subject- matter experts into licensed career and technical education teacher. http://www.nccte.org/publications
  23. [23] Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizational (sixth ed). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  24. [24] Zheng, L. (2014). Validation of a learning environtment instrument in tertiary foreign languagre classrooms in China, Review in Psychology Research, 3 (3), 27-36.