Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 819 Download : 318

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract— This study aims to assess teachers in education. This type of research is combination research (quantitative and qualitative). Research subjects were 55 people. The research data was obtained through questionnaires, peers, interviews, and data from the analysis using a percentage formula. The results of the study found that pedagogic competence: (1) For the questionnaire the average total score was 4.2. (2) For peer rankings average total score of 4.0, with the achievement level of respondents 80% remaining in the "good" category, (3) Average productivity score of 4.0, with an achievement level of respondents 80% in the category " good ", and (4) For the results of interviews that discuss the principal, curriculum curriculum and 7 heads of productive majors, with the conclusion of the" good "category. While for the competence of the soul is obtained (1) For the questionnaire the total score is 4.3. (2) For the rank of peers the average total score is 4.2, with the achievement level of respondents 84% ​​in the "good" category, (3) Average productivity score 4.1, with 82% respondents' achievement in the category " good ", and (4) For the results of interviews that discuss the principal, curriculum curriculum and 7 heads of productive departments with the" good "category.

Keywords

Performance Assessment, Productive Teachers, Teacher Competency Standards.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Dedi Setiawan, Dwi Sudarno Putra, Hendra Dani Saputra (2020)
How to Cite
Setiawan, D., Saputra, H., Muslim, M., & Chandra, R. (2020). Penilaian Kinerja Guru Produktif Dalam Melaksanakan Standar Kompetensi Guru. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 20(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i1.361

References

  1. [1] A. Ahyanuardi, H. Hambali, And K. Krismadinata, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Dan Profesional Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pasca Sertfikasi Terhadap Komitmen Guru Melaksanakan Proses Pembelajaran,” Invotek J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., Vol. 18, No. 1, Pp. 67–74, Jul. 2018.
  2. [2] H. Hamdani and K. Krismadinata, “Kontribusi Kompetensi Dan Persepsi Tentang Supervisi Pembelajaran Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Guru,” Invotek J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., Vol. 17, No. 2, Pp. 61–66, Dec. 2017.
  3. [3] W. L. Sanders and S. P. Horn, “Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (Tvaas) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research,” J. Pers. Eval. Educ., Vol. 12, No. 3, Pp. 247–256, 1998.
  4. [4] M. Fullan, “The New Meaning Of Educational Change,” P. 32.
  5. [5] Y. Indrawati, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Guru Matematika Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi (Kbk) Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Kota Palembang,” P. 18.
  6. [6] B. Sudibyo, “Menteri Pendidikan Nasional,” P. 31.
  7. [7] M. Inayah,R T. ,& Sawiji, H., “Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru, Motivasi Belajar Dan Fasilitas Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Ips Sma Negeri 1 Lasem Jawa Tengah Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012 (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta).”
  8. [8] Kemendikbud, “Tentang Pan & Rb No 16 Tahun 2009.” 2012.
  9. [9] Kusaeri Suprananto, Pengukuran Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.
  10. [10] H. Sadtyadi and B. Kartowagiran, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar Berbasis Tugas Pokok Dan Fungsi,” J. Penelit. Dan Eval. Pendidik. Vol. 18, No. 2, Pp. 290–304, Dec. 2014.
  11. [11] Pan & Rb No 16 Tahun 2009. (Jakarta Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan 2012)..Pdf.”.
  12. [12] K. R. Prasetyowati And T. Sutojo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilai Kinerja Guru (Pkg) Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) (Studi Kasus) Sma Negeri 9 Semarang,” P. 5.
  13. [13] J. Pramono, “Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Smk Negeri 6 Surakarta Dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard,” Balanc. Scorec. P. 21, 2014.
  14. [14] Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Pt. Rosda Karya, 2000.
  15. [15] Jamil Suprihatiningrum, Guru Profesional Pedoman Kinerja, Kualifikasi Dan Kompetensi Guru. Yogyakarta: Ar - Ruzzmedia, 2013.
  16. [16] Depdiknas, “Undang-Undang No 14 Tahun 2015 Tentang Guru Dan Dosen,” 2012.
  17. [17] Depdiknas, “Undang - Undang No 16 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi dan Kompetensi Guru,” 2012.
  18. [18] Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik Dan Tenaga Kependidikan 2010, “Kompetensi Dan Indikator Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Guru.” Www.Bermutuprofesi.Org, 2013.
  19. [19] Barnawi & Mohammad Arifin, Kinerja Guru Profesional. Bandung: Ar - Ruzzmedia, 2012.
  20. [20] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta, 2012.