Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3756 Download : 2797

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study discuss about the practicality of interactive instructional media on Electrical Circuits Learning Process with students grade X in Technical and Vocational Middle School (SMK) 5 Padang. This research will reveal the practicality level of the use of interactive instructional media both by teachers and students after using this interactive learning media in the learning process. Subjects in this study were 2 teachers and 30 students. Questionnaire sheets that have been validated by experts were used as instruments in this study to collect teacher response data and student responses related to media practicality. The data obtained is processed using descriptive analysis techniques by referring to the systematic steps of practicality testing. The results showed that based on the teacher's response, the practicality level of the media was very practical, whereas based on the students' responses, the practicality level of learning media was also very practical. So, it can be concluded that interactive instructional media is very practical to be used by teachers and students in the Electrical Circuit learning process.

Keywords

Interactive Instructional Media Practicality Electrical Circuit Learning Process

Article Details

How to Cite
Yanto, D. T. P. (2019). Praktikalitas Media Pembelajaran Interaktif pada Proses Pembelajaran Rangkaian Listrik. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 19(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v19i1.409

References

  1. [1] Ansyar, Rayandra, 2011, Kreatif Mengembangkan Media Pembelajaran, Gaung Persada, Jakarta.
  2. [2] Chan H. S., Morgan S. (2015). Interactive Learning Media to Enhancing Student’ Learning Process. Journal Of Education Research,18, 1467-1472. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  3. [3] Chen Y. T. (2013). A Study Of Learning Effects On E-Learning with Interactive Thematic Video. Jounal Of Educational Method Research, 20, 279-292. New York: Sage Journals.
  4. [4] Diergarten K. A., Mockel T., Nieding G., et al. (2017). The Impact of Media Literacy on Children’s Learning from Films and Hypermedia. Journal Of Technical Education. 21, 33-41, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  5. [5] Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri, 1997, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
  6. [6] Gan B., Menkhoff T., Smith R. (2015). Enhancing Student’ Learning Process through Interactive Digital Media: New Oppotunities for Collaborative Learning. Journal Of Educational Research, 21, 1541-1552. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  7. [7] Gufron A., Jasman I. (2012). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta didik Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan, 21, 21-25, Yogyakata: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  8. [8] Hawlitschek A., Joeckel S. (2017). Increasing The Effectiveness of Digital Educational Games: The Effects of a Learning nstruction on Student’ Learning, Motivaton and Cognitive Load. Journal of Education Research, 25, 1243-1251. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  9. [9] Helou, A.M., Rahim, N.Z.A. (2014). The influence of social networking sites on students’ academic performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Electron. Malaysia: Commerce.
  10. [10] Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L., Tam, K.Y., (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal Of Management and Information, 16, 91–112, The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia : King Saud University.
  11. [11] Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschnker, P.A., Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Journal of Education & Psychology, 22, 139–154, The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia: King Saud University.
  12. [12] Kaplan, M., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite. The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Journal of Computer dan Education. 53, 59–68, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  13. [13] Kim, B., Kim, T., Shin, S.W. (2011). Understanding antecedents of continuance intention in social-networking services. Journal Of Behavior of Social Network, 14, 45-51. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  14. [14] Kirschner, A., Karpinski, C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Jounal Of Computer and Humaniora, 26, 1237–1245, The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia: King Saud University.
  15. [15] Larusson, J., Alterman, R., (2009). Wikis to support the collaborative part of collaborative learning. Journal of Computer & Education, 4, 76-89, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  16. [16] Murti A. R., (2014). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 14, 34-36. Yogyakarta: Universitas Yogtakarta.
  17. [17] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
  18. [18] Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
  19. [19] Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97.
  20. [20] Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
  21. [21] Riduwan, 2010, Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian, Alfabeta, Bandung.
  22. [22] Rusman dkk., 2011, Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
  23. [23] Sugiyono, 2008, Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.