Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract- Extracurricular program is a learning process in which performed outside of school. The study attempts to explore the components of context, input, process and product of extracurricular program at Al-Khoir Islamic boarding school. In this study, the evaluation model used by Stufflebeam namely the CIPP (context, input, process, product) evaluation model. This study used mixed method; qualitative and quantitative. interviewing was carried out with the teacher (qualitatively) while scoring students’ test result (quantitatively). The findings showed that the components of context, input, process, product and results of extracurricular program at Al-Khoir Islamic boarding school were categorized as good. Therefore, Al-Khoir boarding school could maintain the extracurricular program and continue to improve any perceived shortcomings after evaluating the program. Thus, in this study, students are suggested to be more active and serious in extracurricular programs because it is very useful for them to add their knowledge and skills. It is suggested to make the improvements to each component of the context, input, process and product and to be more active and innovative in designing curriculum and planning before doing the extracurricular programs.


 


Keywords : Mixed Method, CIPP, Extracurricular Program

Keywords

Mixed Method, CIPP, Extracurricular Program

Article Details

How to Cite
Harahap, N., & Rizal, F. (2020). Evaluasi Program Ekstrakulikuler di Pondok Pesantren Al-khoir Padang Lawas Sumatera Utara. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 20(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i1.658

References

  1. [1] Permendikbud No. 62 Tahun 2014 tentang Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler.
  2. [2] Permendikbud No. 63 Tahun 2014 tentang Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler.
  3. [3] Nurhayati & Anin. “Inovasi Kurikulum: Telaah terhadap Pengembangan Kurikulum Pesantren”. Yogyakarta: Teras. 2010.
  4. [4] Arikunto dan Jabar. “Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Pedoman teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan”. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
  5. [5] Farida Yusuf & Tayibnafis, “Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan penelitian” Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
  6. [6] Arikunto dan Jabar. “Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Pedoman teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2009.
  7. [7] Arikunto. ” Pedoman Teoritis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan”. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.,2009.
  8. [8] Arikunto, Suharsimi & Abdul Jabar. ” Evaluasi Program Pendidikan”. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2009.
  9. [9] Miles, Matthew B, A. Michael Huberman dan Johnny Saldana. “Analisis Data Kualitatif”. Jakarta: UI Press, 2014,
  10. [10] Stufflebeam, Daniel. L & Shinkfield, Anthony J. “Systematic evaluation: A Self-Instructional Guide to Theori and practice. San fransisco”: jossey bass, 1988.
  11. [11] Amirin, Tatang M. “Populasi dan sampel penelitian 4: Ukuran sampel rumus Slovin.” 2011.
  12. [12] Riduan. “Statistik”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009.
  13. [13] Tayibnapis & Farida. “Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk program pendidikan dan penelitian”. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2008.
  14. [14] Mulyatiningsih, Endang. “Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
  15. [15] Kelsey LD, Hearne CC. “Cooperative Extension Work”. Ithaca: Comstock Publishing Associates, 2005.
  16. [16] Matin dan Nurhattati Fuad, “Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan”. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.