Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 132 Download : 105

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study is an implementation of the STEMProcsi model that aims to 1) Knowing the students ' understanding of learning Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathemetic, Projects and Simulation (STEMProcSi). 2) to measure student skills in using the STEMProcsi components that produce a project, and 3) Assessing students' attitudes towards the STEMProcSi learning model. This research used 15 students as sample of Computer and Informatics Engineering Education (PTIK) in the odd semester of the academic year 2019/2020. The research procedure was carried out in trhee steps; 1) provides problems that are solved by concept maps using the XMIND application, 2) Complete calculations using the Microsoft Excel application, and 3) Create interactive products with the Scatch application. The research instrument uses a questionnaire with 5 liker scale. Based on data analysis, the results of this study indicate that the application of the STEMProcSi model can generate interest and enthusiasm of students in understanding the material, practice critical thinking, creative, communicative and collaborative and can produce an interactive product. Therefore it can be concluded that the STEMProcsi model is good to be used in the learning process for exact subject courses in tertiary institutions.

Keywords

STEM Model STEMProcSi Creativity

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): karmila suryani (2020)
How to Cite
Suryani, K., & Khairudin, K. (2020). Implementasi Model STEMPROCSI Studi Kasus Pada Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 20(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v20i1.663

References

  1. Klaus, S. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. Retrieved from https://www. Weforum .org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
  2. [2] Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. 2009. STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon. Pennsylvania.
  3. [3] Carter. L. 2017. Neoliberalism and STEM Education: Some Australian Policy Discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. ISSN: 1492-6156 (Print) 1942-4051 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucjs20
  4. [4] Krug, D., & Shaw, A. 2016. Reconceptualizing STEAMS education for teacher education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 183–200.
  5. [5] Thumlert, K. 2015. Affordances of equality: Ranciere, emerging media and the new amateur. Studies in Art Education, 56(2), 114–126
  6. [6] Young VM, House A, Wang H, et al. 2011. Inclusive STEM schools: early promise in Texas and unanswered questions. Paperpresentedat: NationalResearchCouncilWorkshoponSuccessful STEMEducationinK- 12Schools; Washington, DC.
  7. [7] Bicer A, Navruz B, Capraro RM, et al. 2015. STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: comparing students’mathematic state based test performance. IJGE. 3(3):8–18.
  8. [8] NavruzB, ErdoganN, BicerA, et al.WouldaSTEMschool‘byanyothernamesmellassweet’? Intenational Journal Contemp Education Res.1(2):67–75
  9. [9] Corlu, M.A., & Corlu, M.S. 2012. The future of undergraduate science mathematics teaching programs. Paper Presented at the International Symposium of Teacher Education Policies and Problems, Ankara, Turkey.
  10. [10] Means. B, HouseA,YoungV, et al. 2013 ExpandingaccesstoSTEM-focusededucation:whatarethe effects white paper? Symposium presented at: 86th Annual International Conference; RioGrande, PuertoRico.
  11. [11] Ali Bicer, Robert M. Capraro & Mary M. Capraro, 2017. Hispanic students’ mathematics achievement in the context of their high school types as STEM and non-STEM schools, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.1-16
  12. [12] Cohen, B. 2016. Teaching STEM after school: Correlates of instructional comfort. The Journal of Educational Research.ISSN: 0022-0671 (Print) 1940-0675 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjer20
  13. [13] J.F., & Monagan, M.B. 2007. Teaching mathematics to chemistry students with symbolic computation. Journal of Chemistry Education, 84(2), 889-896.
  14. [14] Walker, E. 2007. “Rethinking Professional Development For Elementary Mathematics Teachers”. Journal of Teacher Education Quarterly, 22(1), 113-134.
  15. [15] Langley-Turnbaugh, S.J., Wilson, G., & Lovewell, L. (2009). Increasing the accessibility of science for all students. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 13(1), 1-8.
  16. [16] York, E. 2018. Doing STS in STEM spaces: Experiments in critical participation. Engineering Studies, 10(1), 66–84.
  17. [17] Zeidler, D. L. 2014. “Socioscientific Issues As A Curriculum Emphasis: Theory, Research, And Practice. In NG Lederman & SK Abell (Eds.)”, Handbook of research on science education 2, pp 697–726). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. [18] Zeidler, D. L. 2016. STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century
  19. [19] Yazzie, T., & Peacock, M. 2018. STEM education and outreach: putting invisible wonders into the spotlight of science education. Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference. British Columbia. University Archives, Heritage Resources, Western Libraries, Western Washington University.
  20. [20] Berlin, D.F., & White, A.L. 2010. “Preservice Mathematics And Science Teachers In An Integrated Teacher Preparation Program For Grades 7-12: A 3-Year Study Of Attitudes And Perceptions Related To Integration”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115.
  21. [21] Sudira, P. 2016.TVET abad XXI filosofi, teori, konsep, dan strategi pembelajaran vokasionaL. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
  22. [22] Button, C.E. 2009. “Towards Carbon Neutrality And Environmental Sustainability At CCSU”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(3), 279-86.