Main Article Content
This study aims to support Jigsaw learning and problem based learning models (PBL) in the development of students' thinking skills. This study used an experimental design using a pretest-posttest group pre-experimental design. The collaboration model implementation was carried out at Pelita Indonesia Computer Science College, Pekanbaru involving 17 semester III students majoring in Informatics Engineering. Before and after the implementation of collaboration 2 models, students were given a test of critical thinking skills that arranged in the same composition. The research data in the form of pretest and posttest scores conducted by t-test and the calculated gain scores are supported by the SPSS 25 program. These scores indicate the difference between the pretest score and posttest score with a significance result of 0,000 <0.05. The average pretest and posttest scores were respectively called 46.06 and 70.59. Thus, the implementation of the Jigsaw collaboration model and problem-based learning (PBL) is effective for developing students' critical thinking skills. From the findings of this study, there are obstacles that limit time in implementing the collaboration of the two models. This obstacle occurs when presenting the results of group discussions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- FitzPatrick, B., & Schulz, H. (2015). Do Curriculum Outcomes and Assessment Activities in Science Encourage Higher Order Thinking? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(2), 136–154.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Retrieved from http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780133115284/samplepages/0133115283.pdf
- Florea, N. M., & Hurjui, E. (2015). Critical Thinking in Elementary School Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.161.
- Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An Integrated Critical Thinking Framework for the 21st Century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
- Kartimi., & Liliasari. (2012). Implementasi Pengembangan Alat Ukur Berpikir Kritis Pada Konsep Kesetimbangan Kimia untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia, 1(2), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v1i2.505.
- Syutharidho., & Rakhmawati, R. (2015). Pengembangan Soal Berpikir Kritis Untuk Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 219–227. Retrieved from http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-jabar/article/view/45
- Pradana, S. D. S., Parno., & Handayanto, S. K. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Optik Geometri Untuk Mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.13139.
- Pappas, E., Pierrakos, O., & Nagel, R. (2013). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Teach Sustainability in Multiple Contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.039.
- Anderson, L. W., dan Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
- Magas, C. P., Gruppen, L. D., Barrett, M., Dedhia, P. H., & Sandhu, G. (2017). Intraoperative Questioning to Advance Higher-Order Thinking. American Journal of Surgery, 213(2), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.027.
- Puteh, M. S., & Hamid, F. A. (2014). A Test on Critical Thinking Level of Graduating Bachelor of Accounting Students: Malaysian Evidence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2794–2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.658.
- Schoenberger-Orgad, M., & Spiller, D. (2014). Critical Thinkers and Capable Practitioners. Journal of Communication Management, 18(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2012-0085.
- Pozzi, F. (2010). Using Jigsaw and Case Study for Supporting Online Collaborative Learning. Computers and Education, 55(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.003.
- Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9047-8.
- Gambari, A. I., Yusuf, M. O., & Thomas, D. A. (2015). Effects of Computer-Assisted STAD, LTM and ICI Cooperative Learning Strategies on Nigerian Secondary School Students’ Achievement, Gender and Motivation in Physics. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(4), 11–26. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085925
- Asyari, M., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Susilo, H., & Ibrohim. (2016). Improving Critical Thinking Skills Through the Integration of Problem Based Learning and Group Investigation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2014-0042.
- Schechter, C. (2011). Switching Cognitive Gears Problem-Based Learning and Success-Based Learning as Instructional Frameworks in Leadership Education. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116707.
- Alrahlah, A. (2016). How Effective the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Dental Education. A Critical Review. The Saudi Dental Journal, 28, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.08.003
- Cvetković, B. N., & Stanojević, D. (2017). Educational Needs of Teacher for Introduction and Application of Innovative Models in Educational Work to Improve Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 5(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1701049N.
- Xhemajli, A., Cyril, & Methodius. (2016). The Role of The Teacher in Interactive Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 4(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601031X.