Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 90 Download : 49

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The issue of curriculum relevance in vocational education is a crucial issue of all time. The relevance of the curriculum has two blades, whether it will be the biggest strength or even the biggest weakness in vocational education. Relevance will link the existing employment potential and the graduate's ability to fulfill the job requirements. This research aims to determine the relevance of the independent vocational school learning curriculum, especially in the field of construction, with the competencies needed in the world of work. This research uses a qualitative approach with participants being teachers in the field of study, especially construction and leaders/heads/managers in companies. Data collection was carried out through a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The questions in the FGD consisted of open-ended questions to find out participants' answers in detail. The research results show that there is relevance between the Merdeka Curriculum and the needs of industry, especially in the building construction sector. Vocational school graduates generally have opportunities in small-scale construction industry services and efforts to increase relevance between schools and industry are to increase cooperation and increase teacher competence.

Keywords

Relevance Merdeka Curriculum Competency Industry Construction Sector

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Anisah Anisah, Tuti Iriani, M. Agphin Ramadhan, Yusrina Yusrina (2024)
How to Cite
Anisah, A., Iriani, T., Ramadhan, M., & Yusrina, Y. (2024). The Relevance of the Merdeka Curriculum Vocational School to the Competency Needs in the Construction Field in the Industry. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 23(3), 199-206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v23i3.1161

References

  1. Y. Indarta, N. Jalinus, W. Waskito, A. D. Samala, A. R. Riyanda, and N. H. Adi, “Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Perkembangan Era Society 5.0,” EDUKATIF J. ILMU Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3011–3024, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589.
  2. A. T. Daga, “Makna Merdeka Belajar dan Penguatan Peran Guru di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1075–1090, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1279.
  3. K. O. Oloruntegbe, J. O. Agbayewa, S. O. Adodo, D. Adare, and A. M. Laleye, “Reconceptualization of African Vocational and Technological Education for Emergent Globalization, Relevance and Suistainable Economic Developtment,” Int. J. Vocat. Tech. Educ., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 55–61, 2010, doi: 10.5897/IJVTE.9000027
  4. B. Canavan and R. Doherty, “Technical education in Scotland: Fit for purpose?,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 291–304, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10798-007-9031-7.
  5. K. A. Hodge and J. L. Lear, “Employment Skills for 21st Century Workplace: The Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions,” J. Career Tech. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 28–41, 2011, doi: 10.21061/jcte.v26i2.523
  6. M. D. Miller, Principles and a Philosophy for Vocational Education. Special Publication Series No. 48. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University, 1984.
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), “Keadaan Pekerja di Indonesia,” Jakarta, 2023.
  8. Presiden Republik Indonesia, UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Indonesia, 2003, p. 57.
  9. E. Forcael, I. Ferrari, and A. Opazo-vega, “Construction 4.0 : A Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1–28, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12229755.
  10. M. Bruri Triyono, T. Köhler, and L. Trianingsih, “Technical working skills of vocational high school students at the interface between digital workplaces and school. An empirical study about construction engineering drawings in Indonesia.,” in Communities in New Media: Research on Knowledge Communities in Science, Business, Education and Public Administration - Proceedings of 21th Conference GeNeMe, 2018, pp. 191–200.
  11. Kepala BKSAM, Keputusan Kepala BSKAM Kemendikbud Ristek No 024/H/KR/2022 tentang Konsentrasi Keahlian SMK/MAK pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Indonesia, 2022.
  12. D. Jatmoko, “Relevansi kurikulum SMK kompetensi keahlian teknik kendaraan ringan terhadap kebutuhan dunia industri di Kabupaten Sleman,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1572.
  13. E. Mulyana, “Kesesuaian Kemampuan Lulusan SMK di Dunia Kerja (Studi Kasus pada Kontraktor Listrik di Jawa Barat),” proceedingfptk, vol. 436, 2015.
  14. C. W. Wati, R. M. Sugandi, and Isnandar, “Analysis of job competency requirements in the construction services industry for vocational high school of construction and property engineering expertise programs,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2019.
  15. I. Putranto, “PENGEMBANGAN MODEL KERJA SAMA LINK AND MATCH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KESIAPAN KERJA BAGI LULUSAN SMK KOMPETENSI KEAHLIAN AKUNTANSI DI KOTA SEMARANG,” J. Mandiri Ilmu Pengetahuan, Seni, dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–83, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.33753/mandiri.v1i1.10.
  16. R. W. Daryono, A. P. Yolando, A. Jaedun, and N. Hidayat, “Competency of vocational schools required by construction industry in consultants’ supervisor,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1456, no. 1, p. 012057, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012057.
  17. R. A. Tauhid, “Relevansi kompetensi lulusan SMK kompetensi keahlian bisnis konstruksi dan properti SMKN 1 cibinong dengan kompetensi yang diperlukan di dunia kerja,” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/84375
  18. N. S. Handriyanti, A. R. Asrib, and B. A. Rauf, “Relevansi Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Menggambar Menggunakan Program Autocad di SMK Terhadap Kebutuhan Kompetensi Tenaga Drafter pada Jasa Konstruksi di Dunia Industri,” Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/14073
  19. S. Purnomo, E. Djufri, and A. Khaharsyah, “Pendidikan jarak jauh (PJJ) berbasis e-learning edmodo mahasiswa pendidikan vokasional teknik mesin,” J. Taman Vokasi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.30738/jtv.v8i2.9053.
  20. S. Warnandes, L. Hariyanto, and G. N. Indriatno Putra Pratama, “Relevansi Kompetensi Lulusan S1 Pendidikan Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta dengan Kebutuhan Dunia Industri Jasa Konstruksi Bidang Perencana,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–61, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.21831/jpts.v4i1.48489.
  21. C. Yuliana, “Studi Pemahaman dan Penerapan Standar Kompetensi Keterampilan Kerja Tenaga Kerja pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi,” J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Tek., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 2009, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/infotek.v10i1.1764.
  22. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, “Capaian Pembelajaran dan Alur Tujuan Pembelajaran,” CP & ATP, 2024. https://guru.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum/referensi-penerapan/capaian-pembelajaran/smk/desain-pemodelan-dan-informasi-bangunan/fase-f/ (accessed Mar. 01, 2024).
  23. Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia (SKKNI), Pelaksana Lapangan Pekerjaan Gedung (Building Construction Engineer), Nomor Registrasi: INA 5231.213.01. Jakarta: Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, 2007.
  24. Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia (SKKNI), Tukang Bekisting dan Perancah (Scafolding and Mold Worker), Nomer Registrasi: INA 5220. Jakarta: Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, 2007.
  25. M. Munadi and H. Abdillah, “Pengaruh Resolusi 3D CAD STL Pada Kualitas Geometri dan Dimensi (G&D) Produk Pola Cor 3D Printer,” Infotekmesin, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 130–136, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.35970/infotekmesin.v11i2.225.
  26. W. Sanjaya, Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran: Teori dan Praktik Pengembangan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, 2011.