Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 157 Download : 102

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the problems in improving the competence of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for mathematics teachers is that the teacher has to leave his / her teaching activities to participate in various improving competence events. This study aims to develop an ICT house portal that will be managed by the Mathematics Subject Teacher Forum in Indonesia or known as MGMP  that allows teachers to interact with fellow teacher communities to improve ICT competence without having to leave their teaching activities at school. Furthermore, the researchers also conducted a usability test of the developed portal. The application development model used is the ADDIE model which stands for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation. Meanwhile, application usability testing was carried out by distributing usability questionnaires to 30 respondents consisting of postgraduate students and lecturers of mathematics education. The results showed that the ADDIE model can be used to design and create the ICT house portal called RumahTIK where the procedures in the development section include making applications, testing by experts, testing content filling, testing the use of clinical features. Based on the results of the usability questionnaire processing, the percentage of usability was 81% which was classified as very feasible. Although this research was not implemented for real teacher groups, the ICT house portal is very suitable for use by the MGMP group. In the future, it is necessary to implement this portal in various MGMP groups so that recommendations can be obtained to improve teachers' ICT competence in mathematics.

Keywords

ADDIE model ICT house portal Competence Usability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Jefri Marzal, Wardi Syafmen, Husni Sabil (2021)
How to Cite
Marzal, J., Syafmen, W., & Sabil, H. (2021). ICT portal for the development of mathematic teachers competence: The development and the feasibility. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 21(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v21i2.902

References

  1. K. Selvi, “Teachers’ competencies,” Cult. Int. J. Philos. Cult. Axiolog., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 167–175, 2010.
  2. T. Trust, “2017 ISTE Standards for Educators: From Teaching With Technology to Using Technology to Empower Learners,” J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2018.
  3. J. Kubrický and P. Částková, “Teachers ICT Competence and their Structure as a Means of Developing Inquiry-based Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 186, pp. 882–885, 2015.
  4. T. Plomp, A. C. A. ten Brummelhuis, and R. Rapmund, Teaching and learning for the future. Den Haag: SDU, 1996.
  5. H. J. Becker, “Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right?,” Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., vol. 8, no. 51, pp. 1–31, 2000.
  6. M. Selinger and R. Austin, “A comparison of the influence of government policy on information and communications technology for teacher training in England and Northern Ireland,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–38, 2003.
  7. P. Pannen, “Integrating Technology in Teaching and Learning Mathematics,” 19th Asian Technol. Conf. Math., pp. 1–15, 2014.
  8. U. A. Chaeruman, “Mengintegrasikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) ke dalam Proses Pembelajaran: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana?,” J. Teknodik, no. April, p. 046, 2019.
  9. H. D. Hermawan, N. Deswila, and D. N. Yunita, “Implementation of ICT in Education in Indonesia during 2004-2017,” Proc. - 2018 Int. Symp. Educ. Technol. ISET 2018, no. May, pp. 108–112, 2018.
  10. A. E. Elemam, “Barriers to Implementation of Information and Communication (ICT) in Public Sudanese Secondary Schools: Teacher’s Prospective,” J. Sociol. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2016.
  11. P. S. Hsu, “Examining Current Beliefs, Practices and Barriers About Technology Integration: A Case Study,” TechTrends, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2016.
  12. S. Hadijah and S. Shalawati, “Investigating Teachers ’ Barriers to ICT ( Information Communication Technology Integration in Teaching English at Senior High Schools,” Proceeding Fifth Int. Semin. English Lang. Teach., pp. 302–310, 2017.
  13. M. Mailizar and L. Fan, “Indonesian teachers’ knowledge of ICT and the use of ICT in secondary mathematics teaching,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020.
  14. L. Sutcher, L. Darling-Hammond, and D. Carver-Thomas, “Understanding teacher shortages: An analysis of teacher supply and demand in the united states,” Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., vol. 27, 2019.
  15. S. Amuko, M. Miheso, and S. Ndeuthi, “Opportunities and Challenges : Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Secondary Schools , Nairobi , Kenya,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 1–7, 2015.
  16. A. Perienen, “Frameworks for ICT Integration in Mathematics Education - A Teacher’s Perspective,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 16, no. 6, 2020.
  17. R. N. Emiliasari, “an Analysis of Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence in Lesson Study of Mgmp Smp Majalengka,” ELTIN JOURNAL, J. English Lang. Teach. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 22, 2018.
  18. A. Arifin, “The Role of MGMP Civic Education in Improving Professional Competence of Teacher,” J. Iqra’ Kaji. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–264, 2019.
  19. Y. Nurlaeli and O. Saryono, “Efektivitas Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Mengajar Guru Bahasa Inggris,” Indones. J. Educ. Manag. Adm. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 308–317, 2018.
  20. U. Sulistiyo and S. Haswindy, “Organizing Professional and Pedagogical Training to Improve English Teachers’ Skills: A Literature Review,” Edukasi J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 2018.
  21. V. Awouters and S. Jans, “E-learning competencies for teachers in secondary and higher education,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 58–60, 2009.
  22. A. Blecken, D. Brüggemann, and W. Marx, “Usability evaluation of a learning management system,” Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., no. June, 2010.
  23. R. M. Branch, Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. London: Springer, 2009.
  24. M. Rusdi, Penelitian Desain dan Pengembangan Kependidikan. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  25. A. M. Lund, “Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire,” Usability interface, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 3–6, 2001.
  26. W. A. Kusuma, V. Noviasari, and G. I. Marthasari, “Analisis Usability dalam User Experience pada Sistem KRS Online UMM menggunakan USE Questionnaire,” J. Nas. Tek. Elektro dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 5, no. 4, 2016.
  27. T. Vithani and A. Kumar, “Modeling the mobile application development lifecycle,” Lect. Notes Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. I, no. January, pp. 596–600, 2014.
  28. N. Moradmand, A. Datta, and G. Oakley, “The Design and Implementation of an Educational Multimedia Mathematics Software: Using ADDIE to Guide Instructional System Design,” J. Appl. Instr. Des., vol. 4, pp. 37–49, 2014.
  29. M. W. Hsu, “An analysis of intention to use in innovative product development model through TAM model,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 487–501, 2016.
  30. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003.