Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 143 Download : 101

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The lack of total student involvement in the learning process is due to a lack of effort in finding information independently and not achieving active learning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of intrinsic motivation on project-based learning in the automotive engineering education student workforce transfer system course. The method used was a quasi-experimental research design with a 2x2 factorial. The population used was students of the Automotive Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Padang State University, 2020/2021 academic year. The results showed that students who applied project-based learning had higher learning outcomes than using conventional methods. This was based on the value of Fcount greater than Ftable, 7.866 > 3.34 at the 0.05 significance level. There is an interaction between learning methods and students' intrinsic motivation towards learning outcomes, this is evidenced by the value of Fcount is greater than Ftable, 7.602> 3.34 at the 0.05 significance level. There is a significant difference in student learning outcomes between project-based learning and conventional learning which has high intrinsic motivation. The final research result is that there is no significant difference in student learning outcomes between project-based learning and conventional learning which has low intrinsic motivation

Keywords

Intrinsic Motivation, Project-based Learning, Quasi Experiment, Two-way Anova

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c): Muslim Muslim, Hendra Dani Saputra; Muhammad Yasep Setiawan; Martias Martias, Muhammad Nasir (2021)
How to Cite
Muslim, M., Saputra, H., Setiawan, M., Martias, M., & Nasir, M. (2021). The influence of project based learning on student’s intrinsic learning motivation. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 21(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v21i2.915

References

  1. [1] W. Sudsomboon, B. Hemwat, and T. Seehamat, “The Appropriateness of Automotive Technology Education Curricular Content Through Competencies as Perceived by Training Instructors,” Bangkok, Thailand, 2008, pp. 118–125.
  2. [2] K. M. Amirkhanova, A. V. Ageeva, and R. M. Fakhretdinov, “Enhancing Students’ Learning Motivation through Reflective Journal Writing,” Kazan, Russia, Jul. 2016, pp. 14–18, doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.07.3.
  3. [3] J. Vibulphol, “Students’ Motivation and Learning and Teachers’ Motivational Strategies in English Classrooms in Thailand,” Engl. Lang. Teach., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 64–75, 2016, doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n4p64.
  4. [4] R. D. Handayani, “Analisis Motivasi Intrinsik dan Ekstrinsik Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 320–333, 2017.
  5. [5] L. Legault, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation,” in Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, V. Zeigler-Hill and T. K. Shackelford, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 1–4.
  6. [6] T. Takahashi, “Motivation of students for learning English in Rwandan schools,” Issues Educ. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 168–186, 2018.
  7. [7] S. Fachraini, “An Analysis of Students’ Motivation in Studying English (A Survey Study at UIN AR-Raniry Banda Aceh),” p. 11, 2017.
  8. [8] F. Koca, “Motivation to Learn and Teacher–Student Relationship,” J. Int. Educ. Leadersh., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2016.
  9. [9] M. Muslim, M. Martias, and M. Nasir, “Correlation of Activities Learning with Learning Outcomes Sudent in Vocational High School,” J. Mech. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 45–56, Dec. 2019.
  10. [10] O. Isik and B. Gucum, “The Effect of Project Based Learning Approach on Elementary School Students’ Motivation Toward Science and Technology Course,” H U J. Educ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 206–218, 2013.
  11. [11] F. Eliza, S. Syamsuarnis, D. E. Myori, and H. Hamdani, “Project based Learning in Lighting Instalations for Simple Buildings Course,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v17i1.13.
  12. [12] F. Eliza, S. Suriyadi, and D. T. P. Yanto, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Psikomotor Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) di SMKN 5 Padang,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 57–66, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v19i2.427.
  13. [13] M. Muslim, A. Ambiyar, D. Setiawan, and R. Putra, “Developing project-based learning tools for light vehicle engine maintenance subjects at vocational high school,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–33, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v10i1.29564.
  14. [14] A. Mojavezi and M. P. Tamiz, “The Impact of Teacher Self-efficacy on the Students’ Motivation and Achievement,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 483–491, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491.
  15. [15] M. Alizadeh, “The Impact of Motivation on English Language Learning,” Int. J. Res. Engl. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 5, 2016.
  16. [16] A. Riswanto and S. Aryani, “Learning motivation and student achievement : description analysis and relationships both,” COUNS-EDU Int. J. Couns. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 42, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.23916/002017026010.
  17. [17] A. N. Hess, “Motivational Design in Information Literacy Instruction,” Commun. Inf. Lit., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–59, 2015, doi: 10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.175.
  18. [18] B. Reena and R. H. Bonjour, “Motivation: Extrinsic and Intrinsic,” Lang. India, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 146–153, 2010.
  19. [19] B. Çetin, “Academic Motivation And Self-Regulated Learning In Predicting Academic Achievement In College,” J. Int. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 95–106, 2015.
  20. [20] C. R. Tucker and D. L. Winsor, “Where Extrinsic Meets Intrinsic Motivation: An Investigation of Black Student Persistence in Pre-Health Careers,” Negro Educ. Rev., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 37–58, 2013.
  21. [21] A. O. Hayenga and J. H. Corpus, “Profiles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: A Person-centered Approach to Motivation and Achievement in Middle School,” Motiv Emot, vol. 34, pp. 371–383, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11031-010-9181-x.
  22. [22] S. Depasque and E. Tricomi, “Effects of Intrinsic Motivation on Feedback Processing during Learning,” NeuroImage, vol. 119, pp. 175–186, 2015.
  23. [23] N. W. Wekesa and R. O. Ongunya, “Project Based Learning on Students’ Performance in the Concept of Classification of Organisms Among Secondary Schools in Kenya,” J. Educ. Pract., vol. 7, no. 16, pp. 25–31, 2016.
  24. [24] J. Lasauskiene and A. Rauduvaite, “Project-Based Learning at University: Teaching Experiences of Lecturers,” in 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece, 2015, vol. 197, pp. 788–792, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.182.
  25. [25] E. de S. Zancul, T. T. Sousa-Zomer, and P. A. Cauchick-Miguel, “Project-based learning approach: improvements of an undergraduate course in new product development,” Production, vol. 27, no. spe, pp. 1–14, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1590/0103-6513.225216.
  26. [26] B. Goodman, Project-Based Learning: A dynamic approach to teaching in which students explore real-world problems and challenges, simultaneously developing 21st Century skills while working in small collaborative groups. Educational Psychology, 2010.
  27. [27] H. Roessingh and W. Chambers, “Project-Based Learning and Pedagogy in Teacher Preparation: Staking Out the Theoretical Mid-Ground,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–71, 2011.
  28. [28] N. Harmer and A. Stokes, The benefits and challenges of project-based learning: A review of the literature. Plymouth University: Pedagogic Research Institute and Observatory (PedRIO), 2014.
  29. [29] C. L. Chiang and H. Lee, “The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 709–712, 2016, doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779.
  30. [30] M.-H. Shin, “Effects of Project-based Learning on Students’ Motivation and Self-efficacy,” Engl. Teach., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 95–114, 2018, doi: 10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95.
  31. [31] H. Darmadi, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
  32. [32] D. N. Jamaludin, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Sikap Ilmiah pada Materi Tumbuhan Biji,” Genet. J. Tadris Biol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–41, 2017.
  33. [33] S. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
  34. [34] A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2010.
  35. [35] D. Setiawan, H. D. Saputra, and R. Chandra, “Penilaian Kinerja Guru Produktif Dalam Melaksanakan Standar Kompetensi Guru,” vol. 20, p. 9.
  36. [36] O. Hamalik, Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.