Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine: (1) the differences in learning outcomes of students who are taught using Augmented Reality (AR) jobsheet learning media with students taught using conventional learning media, (2) differences in learning outcomes of highly motivated students and low motivated students, and (3) the interaction between Project Based Learning learning methods and learning motivation in influencing learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a population of 64 people, the sample was taken as many as 32 people using the cluster random sampling method. Data were collected using a questionnaire for learning motivation and tests for learning outcomes. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis and two-way analysis of variance (Two Ways Anova). The research results found: 1) there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by the Project Based Learning learning method compared to student learning outcomes taught conventionally with Fcount of 7.98 (2) there are differences in learning outcomes of highly motivated students with low motivated students with Fcount 34.40, and (3) there is no learning interaction between learning methods and learning motivation in influencing student learning outcomes with Fcount 3.19

Keywords

Jobsheeet Augmented Reality Learning Outcomes Motivation

Article Details

How to Cite
Prasetya, F., Fajri, B., Syahri, B., Ranuharja, F., Fortuna, A., & Ramadhan, A. (2021). Improved learning outcomes of CNC programming through Augmented Reality jobsheet learning media. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 21(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v21i3.957

References

  1. J. Gutmann, F. Kühbeck, P. O. Berberat, and M. R. Fischer, “Use of Learning Media by Undergraduate Medical Students in Pharmacology : A Prospective Cohort Study,” pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122624.
  2. Y. Liao, F. Deschamps, E. De Freitas, and R. Loures, “Past , present and future of Industry 4 . 0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 7543, no. November, p. 0, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576.
  3. J. Iqra, “Disruptif diri pustakawan dalam menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0 Endang Fatmawati,” vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 1–13, 2018.
  4. S. S. Pratiwi, “Pengaruh Keaktifan Mahasiswa Dalam Organisasi Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. dan Ekon., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2017.
  5. K. Geven, “Simulating the Potential Impacts of COVID-19 School Closures on Schooling and Learning Outcomes: A Set of Global Estimates,” 2020.
  6. A. Jakl, L. Schöffer, M. Husinsky, and M. Wagner, “Augmented reality for industry 4.0: Architecture and user experience,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 2299, pp. 38–42, 2018.
  7. M. K. Bekele, R. Pierdicca, E. Frontoni, E. S. Malinverni, and J. Gain, “A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage,” J. Comput. Cult. Herit., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–36, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3145534.
  8. Á. Di, M. Blanca, and C. Delgado, “Computers & Education Impact of an augmented reality system on students ’ motivation for a visual art course,” Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 586–596, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002.
  9. P. Slamet, “Peran pendidikan vokasi dalam pembangunan ekonomi,” Cakrawala Pendidik., no. Juni, pp. 189–203, 2011.
  10. F. Prasetya, B. R. Fajri, and F. Ranuharja, “Development design augmented reality-based jobsheet in CNC programming subjects,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., 2020.
  11. S. Romina and P. Afonso, “Augmented Reality in Training,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 31, pp. 85–90, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.014.
  12. F. Nopitasari and W. Purnama, “Penggunaan Jobsheet Interaktif dalam Praktikum Analisis Rangkaian Listrik dan Elektronika,” Innov. Vocat. Technol. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2017, doi: 10.17509/invotec.v8i2.6127.
  13. M. Ridwan, “Analisis Penggunaan Jobsheet Pada Mata Kuliah Praktek Instalasi Listrik,” J. Tek., 2010.
  14. M. Fathoni, E. B. Cahyono, and W. A. Kusuma, “ALAT MUSIK PERKUSI AUGMENTED REALITY BERBASIS ANDROID,” 2012.
  15. P. Stief, J. Dantan, A. Etienne, and A. Siadat, “ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Developing Augmented Reality Training Demonstrator Developing an an Augmented Reality Based Based Training Demonstrator for for Manufacturing Cherry Pickers Manufacturing Cherry Pickers A new methodology to analyz,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 81, pp. 803–808, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.203.
  16. R. Azuma, “Tracking Requirements for Augmented Reality,” Commun. ACM, 1993, doi: 10.1145/159544.159581.
  17. M. P. Strzys, S. Kapp, M. Thees, P. Klein, and P. Lukowicz, “Physics holo . lab learning experience : Using Smartglasses for Augmented Reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction,” pp. 1–14.
  18. B. Inggris, “Pengembangan Education Game ( Edugame ) Berbasis Android Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Untuk Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar,” vol. 2, no. November, pp. 1–9, 2015.
  19. W. R. Sherman and A. B. Craig, Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. 2003.
  20. J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in Learning,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., pp. 16–37, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.9734/AJESS/2020/V10I430273.
  21. J. B. Huett, K. E. Kalinowski, L. Moller, and K. C. Huett, “Improving the Motivation and Retention of Online Students Through the Use of ARCS-Based E-Mails,” http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640802224451, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 159–176, 2008, doi: 10.1080/08923640802224451.
  22. M. Billinghurst and H. Kato, “Collaborative augmented reality,” Commun. ACM, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 64–70, 2002, doi: 10.1145/514236.514265.
  23. F. Ferrati, J. A. Erkoyuncu, and S. Court, “Developing an augmented reality based training demonstrator for manufacturing cherry pickers,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 81, pp. 803–808, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.203.